Language access in health & mental health care
For immigrants and refugees with limited English, getting care in your own language is a civil right in federally funded health programs. This page covers the laws that require free, qualified interpreting and translation, how interpreters work, how to ask for one, and what to do if a provider refuses. General education, current as of 19 August 2026, not legal or medical advice; several rules shifted between 2024 and 2026, so confirm with the current official source before acting.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars discrimination because of national origin by any program that receives federal money, which covers most hospitals, clinics, community health centers, public schools and benefits offices. The statute is still law. What has changed is the machinery behind it. The 2002 Justice Department guidance on serving people with limited English was rescinded on 21 March 2025, and a 2025 executive order revoked the older order it rested on. Replacement guidance was promised by January 2026 and, as far as we can tell on 19 August 2026, has not appeared; the federal language access website lep.gov has been offline since July 2025. During 2026 federal agencies also repealed the rules that had treated a practice as discrimination when it shut people out without anyone intending it, which is the theory the language access duty was built on. The Department of Health and Human Services did this on 24 July 2026, and the provision it removed, 45 CFR 80.3(b)(2), now reads simply [Reserved]. HHS says it will still investigate complaints, but is now looking for discrimination that was meant. For health care, the clearer route today is Section 1557, in the next section. Title VI has not gone away and a complaint under it is still possible, but a claim that somebody meant to exclude you is much harder to make than a claim that nobody gave you an interpreter. If it is the interpreter you were refused, the next section is the one to read. You can find free and low-cost legal help near you on the map.
Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act
Section 1557 is the civil rights provision of the Affordable Care Act and, as far as we can establish on 19 August 2026, it is the strongest language rule still standing. It applies to health programs that receive federal funds, including most hospitals, many clinics and marketplace insurers, and HHS sets out what it requires in its own fact sheet on language access. Under the 2024 final rule, covered providers must offer a qualified interpreter and translated materials free of charge and in a timely way, cannot require you to bring a friend or a minor child to interpret, and must post a notice that free language help is available, including on their website, in English and in the 15 languages most commonly spoken in the state. A court struck down parts of the 2024 rule in October 2025 and the Department of Health and Human Services confirmed this on 2 June 2026, but only the parts about gender identity. The language provisions were not touched and are still in the regulations today, and we are not aware of any proposal to change them. This area is changing and this page may already be behind. Please treat it as a starting point. If you were refused an interpreter, it is worth writing down the date, the place and the names, asking the provider for its Section 1557 coordinator, and getting help before you file anything. You can file a civil rights complaint with HHS, which is free and which the office will handle in your language, but it has to be filed within 180 days of what happened, so it is worth not waiting. You can find free and low-cost legal help near you on the map.
Deaf and hard-of-hearing access
If you are Deaf or hard of hearing, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act require providers to ensure effective communication, which often means a qualified sign-language interpreter at no cost to you. When a provider uses Video Remote Interpreting instead of an on-site interpreter, the video must be clear, fast, and large enough to follow, with a trained interpreter; if it does not work for the visit, you can ask for someone in person. You should not be charged, and a family member is not a substitute. Policies change; confirm with the current official source.
National CLAS Standards
The National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS), from the HHS Office of Minority Health, are 15 standards that tell health and behavioral-health organizations how to deliver care that fits your language and culture. They call for offering language assistance at no cost, using competent interpreters instead of untrained staff or family, and providing easy-to-understand materials and signage in your language. Many states, hospitals, and mental-health agencies adopt CLAS, and there is a specific Behavioral Health Implementation Guide for mental-health and substance-use settings. Some states now require CLAS-aligned cultural-competency training for health professionals; you can see which on the Policy map.
Medicaid and CHIP coverage for interpreters
You should never be charged for an interpreter the law requires. Behind that, states can be reimbursed by the federal government for interpretation and translation: at the standard 50% administrative match, and at 75% for services tied to enrolling and keeping coverage for children in families whose first language is not English. States are not required to take the higher option up, which is part of why coverage varies so much from one state to another. That arrangement appears unchanged. Separately, and more urgently: a 2025 law changes who Medicaid and CHIP can cover. From 1 October 2026, as the guidance to states is written, federal Medicaid and CHIP money will only pay for US citizens and nationals, green-card holders, Cuban and Haitian entrants, and COFA migrants. Refugees, asylees, people with TPS, parolees and trafficking survivors would lose full Medicaid and CHIP. Emergency Medicaid stays, and some states may still be able to cover lawfully residing children and pregnant people. Nobody should have to work this out from a letter. If one comes from your state about your coverage, take it to somebody before you answer it, and to an immigration lawyer or a DOJ-accredited representative if it asks about your status. You can find free and low-cost legal help near you on the map.
Mental health parity (MHPAEA)
The federal parity law says a health plan cannot treat mental health and substance use care worse than physical health care, in what it charges you, how long it will cover, or how hard it makes you work to get approval. A 2024 rule added stronger protections, including a duty on plans to study and fix gaps in their behavioural health networks. That rule is still on the books, but since May 2025 the federal agencies have paused enforcement of the parts of it that were new, while a court case about the rule runs; in March 2026 they told the court they intend to propose a replacement. What is still in force and still enforced is the parity law itself, the older 2013 rules, and the 2021 requirement that plans write up a comparison of how they treat mental health and medical care. If your plan denies or limits mental health care, you can ask it in writing for the medical necessity rules it used, the reason for the denial, and that comparison. If your insurance comes through a job, the Employee Benefits Security Administration takes questions on 1-866-444-3272; otherwise your state insurance department does, and many states have their own parity laws they are still enforcing. The parity rules are being rewritten while this page sits here, so check the date on anything you are told. Keep copies of what your plan sends you and the dates you asked for things. If you need help pushing back on a denial, you can find free and low-cost legal help near you on the map.
Types of interpreters, and who should not interpret
Health interpreting comes in three main forms: in-person, which is best for hard, emotional, or mental-health visits; over-the-phone, which is fast and good for short or urgent needs; and video remote interpreting, a face-to-face interpreter on a screen reachable in seconds. A qualified interpreter works accurately and impartially, keeps everything confidential, and knows medical and mental-health vocabulary; a nationally certified medical interpreter (CMI or CHI) has passed a formal exam. A tested bilingual clinician can serve you directly, but a staff member who “speaks a little,” a relative, and especially a minor child are not acceptable substitutes, and tools like Google Translate are not adequate for clinical or mental-health talks. This matters most in mental-health care, where tone and idiom affect the diagnosis.
How to ask for an interpreter
You can ask at any point, and it is free. When you book, tell the scheduler the exact language and dialect you need and that you want a professional interpreter, and ask them to note it in your chart so it is ready every visit. At the desk or on the phone, say plainly, “I need an interpreter in [language], please,” and decline if staff suggest your child or a relative. For a mental-health visit you can ask for an in-person interpreter and, when possible, the same interpreter each time for continuity. If your appointment is telehealth, confirm ahead of time that an interpreter will join, and keep the clinic’s patient-relations or language-access number in case you need to follow up.
If a provider refuses or charges you
If a federally funded provider refuses an interpreter, charges you for one, makes your child interpret, or gives you worse care because of your language, you can file a civil-rights complaint with the HHS Office for Civil Rights, generally within 180 days, with no lawyer and no immigration status required. The complaint is about the provider’s conduct, not about you. You can also ask the hospital for its Section 1557 coordinator or grievance process, and contact a legal-aid or immigrant-rights group for help. Keep notes of dates, names, and what happened. Policies change; confirm the current process on the official source.
Recent changes, 2024 to 2026
In March 2025 the Justice Department rescinded the 2002 guidance that told federally funded programs how to serve people who do not speak much English, and an executive order revoked the order it stood on. lep.gov went offline that July. Replacement guidance was promised for January 2026 and has not appeared. In 2026 federal agencies went further and repealed the Title VI rules that reached practices which shut people out without anyone meaning to; HHS did so on 24 July 2026, leaving 45 CFR 80.3(b)(2) reading [Reserved]. Health care held. The 2024 Section 1557 final rule put detailed language requirements back into the regulations and they are still there: the notice of availability at 45 CFR 92.11 and the qualified interpreter at 45 CFR 92.201. A court struck down parts of that rule in October 2025 and HHS published a notice of vacatur on 2 June 2026, but what fell was about gender identity. The language requirements were left alone. Two things are unfinished. The 2024 mental health parity rule is still in the regulations, but its new requirements have gone unenforced since May 2025 while a court case runs. And a law passed in February 2026 gives HHS until February 2027 to publish good-practice rules for interpreters in telehealth. If something here bears on what happened to you, the sections above say what to ask for and where to complain. You can also find free and low-cost legal help near you on the map.
HHS: Section 1557 language-access guidance US Dept of Labor: Statement on parity-rule enforcement NILC: Language access and civil rights NILC: New policies strengthen health language access Federal Register: Executive Order 14224 Federal Register: Section 1557 final rule (2024) Federal Register: MHPAEA 2024 final rule